![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why do some people title their books "Such-and-Such: A Novel"?
Seriously. If you have to tell me it's a novel, and I won't be able to figure out on my own that it is a fairly lengthy work of fiction, odds are it's either not very good, written for people who don't understand what a novel is, or really, really pretentious. In all cases, I admit that the 'A Novel' part is useful, as it warns me off. (I did actually buy a 'A Novel' book the other day, out of sheer curiosity and because I was desperate and it was a hardcover going for three bucks. It fell into the 'really, really pretentious' category. I plan to take it to the second-hand store and seeing if I can trade it in for some credit towards a beat-up paperback copy of a book that knows it's a novel without having to check its nametag.)
Is it so people can call themselves 'novelists' rather than 'authors'? Is it so I don't start reading it and write angry letters about how I was sucked into reading a five-pound book, thinking it was going to be a short story and would only take me ten minutes, and now I'm suing for the time I lost? Whoops! I mean, anyone could make that mistake, if not warned appropriately. If it's 'A Novel OF' something, that's at least useful. 'A Novel of Discworld', for instance - it lets me know it's a Discworld book, but probably won't deal too much with Ankh-Morpork or any of the main Disc characters.
*Has visions of boxes with 'Cheerios: A Cereal' written on them.*
I may have to put this up on my Life's Greatest Questions list, along with 'who on Earth thought 'Trojan' was a good name for a brand of condoms?' and 'why do my ten identical pairs of socks invariably become twenty odd socks in a matter of weeks?'
Seriously. If you have to tell me it's a novel, and I won't be able to figure out on my own that it is a fairly lengthy work of fiction, odds are it's either not very good, written for people who don't understand what a novel is, or really, really pretentious. In all cases, I admit that the 'A Novel' part is useful, as it warns me off. (I did actually buy a 'A Novel' book the other day, out of sheer curiosity and because I was desperate and it was a hardcover going for three bucks. It fell into the 'really, really pretentious' category. I plan to take it to the second-hand store and seeing if I can trade it in for some credit towards a beat-up paperback copy of a book that knows it's a novel without having to check its nametag.)
Is it so people can call themselves 'novelists' rather than 'authors'? Is it so I don't start reading it and write angry letters about how I was sucked into reading a five-pound book, thinking it was going to be a short story and would only take me ten minutes, and now I'm suing for the time I lost? Whoops! I mean, anyone could make that mistake, if not warned appropriately. If it's 'A Novel OF' something, that's at least useful. 'A Novel of Discworld', for instance - it lets me know it's a Discworld book, but probably won't deal too much with Ankh-Morpork or any of the main Disc characters.
*Has visions of boxes with 'Cheerios: A Cereal' written on them.*
I may have to put this up on my Life's Greatest Questions list, along with 'who on Earth thought 'Trojan' was a good name for a brand of condoms?' and 'why do my ten identical pairs of socks invariably become twenty odd socks in a matter of weeks?'
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 11:45 pm (UTC)*sues for time spent groaning!*
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 04:08 am (UTC)And there are definitely books I have read and wanted to sue for lost time for.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 11:46 pm (UTC)I think I've lost more time listening to recommendations for bad books than actually reading bad books.
"Oh! You really should read The Da Vinci Code!"
Sigh.
(There's a thought. I bet Dan Brown can afford it, he's got legions of fans who love to keep reading the same book with different titles to see if he gets it right this time!)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 03:41 pm (UTC)Trojan as a brand name - I don't think it's the classical reference so much as it is the fact that a guy buying a box will automatically associate the word "horse."
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 11:42 pm (UTC)Raisin D'etre. *snicker*
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 04:14 pm (UTC)Um.... Damn.
No.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 06:38 pm (UTC)Well, okay, that could be taken a couple different ways. One REALLY good one and one REALLY bad.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 11:43 pm (UTC)*uses own 'oops' icon*
no subject
Date: 2006-12-04 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-04 10:59 pm (UTC)(Although this is not nearly long enough to be 'Braveheart')