(no subject)
Aug. 5th, 2005 11:51 pmHave finally managed to watch King Arthur. It was okay, despite the lack of any non-superficial research. Why were the people North of Hadrian's Wall speaking Gaelic? The Gaels, the Scotii, weren't there in strength until a couple of hundred years later! At that point we'd be talking Picts. There was confusion as to what language people were speaking (okay... the Woads spoke Gaelic, the priests prayed in Latin, the Saxons were presumably speaking one of the Saxon dialects even if it did sound like English with a German or American accent depending on the speaker - fair enough, they're talking amongst themselves... but what language were the knights speaking? Latin presumably, but then why was the priest singled out as speaking a special language?), and apparent non-acquaintance with a dictionary by the person who wrote the script. Dude, 'decimated' does not mean what you think it does. When you're describing a slaughter, a term that means that ninety percent of the people got away is not the term to use. Annihilation, sure. Massacre, sure. But not decimation. Also, why was Lancelot in it? He was a late French addition to the legends - you can tell by the way his name doesn't fit in with any of the other characters. Arddu, Gwynhwyfar, Bedwr, Bors, Gawain, Balyn, Balan... Lancelot. One of these things is not like the others.
*end persnicketiness*
Aside from that, there was a lot of highly enjoyable shiny stuff and pretty people. Particularly Ioan Gruffudd. I also liked the mentions of Pelagius and Bishop Germanus; that shows that _some_ effort at research was done, and it did go a bit deeper than "I remember this from high school, kinda."
Or maybe the writers have read Jack Whyte... except Whyte did his research.
Oh well. Good action film, as an action film, but forgettable; at least, to me.
*end persnicketiness*
Aside from that, there was a lot of highly enjoyable shiny stuff and pretty people. Particularly Ioan Gruffudd. I also liked the mentions of Pelagius and Bishop Germanus; that shows that _some_ effort at research was done, and it did go a bit deeper than "I remember this from high school, kinda."
Or maybe the writers have read Jack Whyte... except Whyte did his research.
Oh well. Good action film, as an action film, but forgettable; at least, to me.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 04:13 am (UTC)But yes, lots of man-pretty. Gawain was pretty good-looking. And Tristan. At least, I think it was Tristan. I don't remember him being referred to by name. The one with the hawk.
I'll have to check out the languages tomorrow, and maybe listen to a bit of the French dub. It always cracks me up to hear Parisien French in movies for some reason. Especially period pieces; the Quebec dialect is much more similar to older French because there was less cross-contamination.
/geek
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 06:08 am (UTC)Hm, interesting about the Quebec French, but that makes sense. Since I think they were over here longer than the English were (?), and even American English has retained some aspects that are more historically "correct" than the Brits have. I think Quebec accents are sort of... weird though. The accent reminds me of my high school French classes.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 01:20 pm (UTC)And it's so darn slow!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 01:08 pm (UTC)But Mikkelsen is very nice indeed :)